Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Consumer Confidence Index down in August


NEW YORK – Aug. 28, 2012 – The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index, which improved in July, declined in August. The Index now stands at 60.6, compared to July’s 65.4. The Expectations Index that measures attitudes about the future – what might happen over the next six months – decreased to 70.5 from 78.4. However, the Present Situation Index that measures attitudes currently remained virtually unchanged at 45.8, versus 45.9 a month ago.

“The Consumer Confidence Index is now at its lowest level since late last year,” says Lynn Franco, director of economic indicators at The Conference Board. “Consumers were more apprehensive about business and employment prospects, but more optimistic about their financial prospects despite rising inflation expectations. Consumers’ assessment of current conditions was virtually unchanged, suggesting no significant pickup or deterioration in the pace of growth.”

Consumers claiming business conditions are presently “good” improved to 15.2 percent from 13.7 percent, while those saying business conditions are “bad” was unchanged at 34.4 percent. Consumers’ appraisal of the labor market varied. Those stating jobs are “plentiful” declined to 7 percent from 7.8 percent, but those claiming jobs are “hard to get” edged down to 40.7 percent from 41 percent.

In looking forward to the next six months, the percentage of consumers expecting business conditions to improve declined to 16.5 percent from 19 percent, while those anticipating business conditions will worsen increased to 17.7 percent from 15.1 percent. Consumers’ outlook for the labor market was also less favorable. Those expecting more jobs in the months ahead decreased to 15.4 percent from 17.6 percent, while those anticipating fewer jobs rose to 23.4 percent from 20.6 percent. The proportion of consumers expecting an increase in their incomes, however, improved to 15.7 percent from 14.2 percent.

The Conference Board by Nielsen conducts the monthly Consumer Confidence Survey based on a probability-design random sample. The cutoff date for the preliminary results was Aug. 16.

© 2012 Florida Realtors®

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Inside Indian Creek Island, Miami's Billionaire Bunker

This story appears in the September 10, 2012 issue of Forbes.

Posted for www.miamiforrussian.com and  www.miamiforrussian.ru

Any mere multimillionaire can buy ocean views and build teak docks for 100-foot bespoke boats. The world’s richest pay top dollar for a far more exclusive amenity: security. Such is the case with Miami’s billionaire island fortress, Indian Creek. A Russian mystery buyer recently plunked down $47 million for a plot in Miami-Dade County’s most expensive sale ever (the price eclipsed hedge fund billionaire Edward Lampert’s record-breaking purchase in April for a home right down the street).
The barrier island touts only 40 waterfront property parcels arranged around an ultra private 18-hole golf course. Don’t think about washing ashore to sneak in a quick 18 holes: The sole entrance is heavily guarded, and a private police force patrols the island via boat, jeep and Jet Ski 24 hours a day. Super secure, unless you consider the Iglesias family a major threat.
Here’s just a few of the high-profile folks with Indian Creek Island addresses:

1 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Norman Braman, car dealership billionaire
Sale price: $3.9 million in 1991
The home: County’s priciest sale at the time; 19,000-square-foot house with 8 bedrooms and 10 baths

3 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Anonymous Russian buyer
Sale price: $47 million in August 2012
The home: Resortlike spec compound by Bal Bay Development; amenities include a spa pavilion, 7-limo garage, rooftop bar with Jacuzzi

7 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Julio Iglesias, Latin singer and father of pop star Enrique
Sale price: $14.8 million in June 2012
The home: One of 5 lots owned; razed house at 30 Indian Creek; living here while new mansion built next door

9 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Robert Diener, tech entrepreneur
Sale price: $19.2 million in March 2012
The home: Sold by Calvin Klein Chairman Barry Schwartz; undeveloped 3-acre parcel

12 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Leroy Schecter, chairman of steelmaker Marino/Ware Industries
List price: $45 million
The home: 22,000 square feet with theater, gym, 7-car garage and elevator is up for sale; Schecter to donate proceeds to charity

14 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Edward Lampert, hedge fund billionaire
Sale price: $38.4 million in April 2012

16 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Don Shula, retired football coach for the Miami Dolphins, and wife Mary Anne
Sale price: N/A; ownership granted to Mary Anne in divorce from late billionaire Jackson Stephens
The home: The 2012 tax assessment on the 13,300-square-foot home is$4.5 million

17 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Charles Johnson, mutual fund billionaire
List price: $38 million
The home: 1997 purchase for ?$3.75 million; rebuilt 16,000-square-foot Mediterranean with boat dock

22 Indian Creek Drive
Owner:Adriana Lima, super model, and husband Marko Jaric, pro basketball player
Sale price: $9 million in 2009
The home: Built in 1958; 7,600-square-foot Regency-style house is fresh off a 2-year remodel

24 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Carl Icahn, leveraged-buyout billionaire
Sale price: $7.5 million in 1997
The home: 14,000-square-foot vacation house purchased out of foreclosure

36 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Alex Meruelo, real estate entrepreneur
Sale price: $7.05 million in 2008
The home: 8,500-square-foot house with twin staircases, domed ceiling, frescoes

40 Indian Creek Drive
Owner: Geert-Jan Bakker, chief executive of Dutch company Bakker Magnetics
Sale price: $9.3 million in 2010
The home: Sold by celebrity power couple Beyonce & Jay-Z; 7-bedroom, 8-bath Mediterranean with boat dock

Monday, August 27, 2012

Locksmith scam a new twist

DETROIT – Aug. 27, 2012 – Locks are supposed to keep the crooks away – or at least make them work harder. So who would imagine that there’s a locksmith scam out there?

If you need to change the locks, say someone stole your purse with your house keys, be extra careful when shopping for a locksmith. Some con artists advertise super low prices on the Internet, show up when you call, disassemble the lock and then say they’re going to have to charge far more than advertised.

“And here you are without a functioning lock now,” said Susan Grant, director of consumer protection for the Consumer Federation of America in Washington.

The locksmith scam is just one of the many ways for someone to pick your pocket – and your lock – these days. Keep an eye out for these scams:

Crooks love passing bogus checks, so they are hitting mailboxes and grocery carts.

The homeowner writes a check to the electric company and trustingly leaves the envelope for the mail carrier.

Bad move. The crook gets the envelope first, then tweaks the check – maybe even making the amount bigger – and cashes it.

Stick to electronic bill pay, automatic bill pay or mail bills directly at the post office.

Nationwide, con artists known as the Felony Lane Gang ripped off IDs and checkbooks in Nebraska, Alabama, Illinois and elsewhere. The Detroit Mad Hatters – a group of older women who wore hats – snatched wallets or checkbooks out of purses at supermarkets last year. Sounds simple: But don’t leave your wallet or purse in your car even when you make quick trips.

Fraudsters can scam you with a financial aid pitch, too.

Parents and students need to be skeptical about websites and schemes for quick-fix financial aid. The pitch could be tempting as students head back to college and wonder how to pay the bills. Some deals promise a money-back guarantee, but the Better Business Bureau said there are so many hoops that it’s often impossible to get a refund.

Mark Kantrowitz, publisher of FinAid.org and FastWeb.com, said students shouldn’t be paying $3 or $5 or $50 for a chance at a scholarship. Some of those deals are outright scams, where no scholarship money is paid. Others, he said, might pay out some scholarship money but raise thousands of dollars more in fees than the amount that is paid out to students.

Don’t send money to pay taxes upfront on a so-called scholarship, either.

Don’t lose sleep – and money – over a bogus tax lien.

Some fraudsters are targeting elderly people and students and frightening them into thinking they must address a tax lien. The Internal Revenue Service noted that the schemers can charge victims $5,000 or more to settle bogus federal tax liens. The IRS isn’t initiating contact by using Facebook or texting you.

The dirty secret about some so-called mystery shopping jobs is that you lose $1,000 or more.

Lately, fraud experts report some consumers have gotten caught after finding a secret-shopper job online and then receiving a document that includes logos from big-name retailers, such as Walgreens and Wal-Mart.

“It looks pretty official,” said Dianne Shovely, vice president at Comerica’s fraud services office in Auburn Hills, Mich.

It’s fake. The scammers also send a fake check, say for $1,983.25. The shopper is to spend $100 or so at a time at a store and report on the service and the product. Then, the shopper is to wire back $1,280 and keep the rest.

Well, it’s all a scam.

“They’ve sent you a counterfeit check,” Shovely said. You wire back money and you’re out what you spent shopping – and the money you wired back.

A store-bought prepaid card is a new twist in some scams.

The Ohio Attorney General’s Office reported as part of a consumer survey that one man was asked to put $416 on a prepaid card and send it off to stop calls reportedly from the Legal Department of Florida that claimed he owed money on a payday loan.

But the calls kept coming. So he did more legwork. His payday lender said he only owed $390. He discovered the caller had no connection to the payday loan company. The consumer agency contacted the prepaid card issuer and found out the money was still on the card, thanks to a glitch. The man was able to get his money back.

Another person, according to the survey, stopped an elderly man at a store from putting $500 on a prepaid card so he could send it to someone and claim a $1-million prize in return.

“They really don’t understand what they’re doing is sending cash to someone who is untraceable,” Grant said.

The “Grandparent Scam” remains alive and well.

Don’t wire money to your grandson who needs help in Mexico – or a granddaughter who claims to be in jail in Canada. Contact a family member first to find out whether a relative is really facing financial trouble.

Watch out for someone willing to pay more than what you asked for that used car or that hardly worn engagement ring.

One of the top Internet scams is a fake buyer who offers a legitimate-looking check for more than the asking price. The so-called buyer needs you to wire back excess cash. Weeks later, the seller finds out that the check was bogus. The seller is then on the hook for any bounced checks, the money lost that was withdrawn from the bank and the loss of the item that was sold. Western Union warns that if a buyer insists that you wire money back from a legitimate-looking check, don’t do it.

Con artists like to drop official sounding names or deals to make a deal seem legit.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, for example, doesn’t have a sweepstakes going where you can get a check worth up to $1.5 million – if you pay the “taxes” before you get the award.

President Barack Obama is not paying your utility bills.

Consumers nationwide have been getting telephone calls and text messages claiming that President Obama has a new federal program that provides credits or applies payments to electric or gas bills. All you have to do is give over your Social Security number and bank account information.

Of course, the bill doesn’t get paid. And you are very likely going to lose money from your account by scammers or be a victim of ID theft.

Consumers Energy said more than 2,300 of its customers have sought $1 million as victims of a nationwide utility scam. DTE Energy said it had about 3,500 customers that made payments with the fake number. DTE said it reversed the non-sufficient fees for customers who sent in such payments and has alerted customers about the scam.

Copyright © 2012 Detroit Free Press, Susan Tompor, personal finance columnist. Distributed by MCT Information Services.